Prescription drug charges in Ohio represent a significant area of concern in criminal law, particularly given the increasing prevalence of prescription drug misuse and the state’s rigorous stance on drug-related offenses. The state of Ohio has implemented strict laws to regulate the possession, distribution, and use of prescription medications, and individuals who find themselves charged with such offenses face potentially severe penalties. However, it is crucial to recognize that being charged with a prescription drug offense does not automatically translate into a conviction. There are numerous defenses available that can be employed to challenge these charges effectively. Understanding these defenses can make a substantial difference in the outcome of a case, and it is here that a thorough examination of the potential strategies is warranted.
Dan Sabol
Dan is the first attorney in Ohio to be both board certified in criminal trial law by the National Board of Trial Advocacy and be designated as a Lawyer Scientist by the American Chemical Society.
Chase Mallory
Chase Mallory is a firm founder whom has tried over 40 cases and conducted more than 100 suppression hearings. He is a founding member of the DUI Defense Lawyers Association
Meet the lawyers who make up the legal team at Sabol Mallory LLC. Read their individual bios and get to know more about their education, experience and accolades.
Learn more about our teamUnlawful Search and Seizure
One of the most common and effective defenses against prescription drug charges in Ohio is the argument of unlawful search and seizure. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by law enforcement. This means that, in most cases, police officers are required to obtain a valid warrant before conducting a search of a person’s property, including their vehicle, home, or personal belongings. If law enforcement conducted a search without a warrant, or if the warrant was improperly obtained or executed, any evidence gathered during that search may be deemed inadmissible in court. For instance, if prescription drugs were discovered in your vehicle during a traffic stop where the police lacked reasonable suspicion or probable cause, the search could be considered illegal. Similarly, if law enforcement officers obtained a warrant based on false or misleading information, the evidence collected as a result of that warrant could be excluded. The exclusion of such evidence can significantly weaken the prosecution’s case and may even lead to the dismissal of the charges.
Lack of Knowledge or Intent
Another critical defense against prescription drug charges is the lack of knowledge or intent. Ohio law requires that the prosecution prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused knowingly and intentionally possessed or distributed the prescription drugs in question. If the defense can demonstrate that the defendant did not have knowledge of the presence of the drugs or did not intend to possess or distribute them, this could form the basis of a strong defense. For example, consider a scenario where prescription drugs are found in a vehicle or home that the defendant shares with other individuals. In such cases, the defense may argue that the defendant was unaware of the drugs’ presence or that the drugs belonged to someone else. Similarly, if a defendant is accused of distributing prescription drugs but believed that the drugs were legally prescribed and intended for legitimate medical use, the defense could argue that there was no intent to distribute the drugs unlawfully.
Valid Prescription Defense
Possessing prescription medication without a valid prescription is a criminal offense in Ohio. However, if an individual charged with such an offense can prove that they had a valid prescription for the medication in question, this could serve as a complete defense to the charges. The validity of a prescription can be established by presenting evidence such as a prescription bottle with the defendant’s name, a copy of the written prescription from a licensed healthcare provider, or pharmacy records showing that the medication was legally dispensed to the defendant. It is also essential to consider situations where a defendant has a valid prescription, but the quantity of medication in their possession exceeds the amount typically prescribed. In these cases, the defense may need to provide additional evidence to justify the larger quantity, such as a medical condition requiring higher dosages or a recent trip that necessitated bringing more medication than usual. Establishing the existence of a valid prescription is a powerful defense that can result in the dismissal of charges or an acquittal at trial.
Entrapment
Entrapment is another defense that may be applicable in prescription drug cases, particularly those involving undercover law enforcement operations. Entrapment occurs when a law enforcement officer induces a person to commit a criminal offense that they would not have otherwise committed. In Ohio, the defense of entrapment is viable if the defendant can show that they were persuaded, coerced, or pressured by law enforcement into engaging in illegal activity related to prescription drugs. This could involve scenarios where an undercover officer or informant encourages the defendant to sell or distribute prescription medication or where the officer provides the defendant with drugs and then arrests them for possession or distribution. The key to a successful entrapment defense is demonstrating that the defendant was not predisposed to commit the crime and that the idea to engage in illegal activity originated with law enforcement, not the defendant.
Client
Testimonials
Learn what our clients have to say about the work of Sabol Mallory. If you have any questions or need legal help for a criminal charge, please reach out to us right away.
Chase Mallory is incredible. He is wonderful to work with and knows exactly what to do to help his clients. Thank you from the bottom of my heart for all you've done for me. I highly recommend hiring Chase to help fight your battles. Bless you!
- Erin R.
Dan Sabol is probably the best attorney I've ever worked with. Very professional and worked hard to get the best results possible. He will be the first person I call if I need a lawyer again. If you find yourself in a sticky situation make sure you give him a ring.
- Christopher R.
I had the pleasure of working with Dan and Chase and I am very grateful!! They did amazing work to help me on my case. They are very helpful and get back with you in a timely manner whenever I had questions for them, which was very nice and reassuring.
- Jessica H.
Medical Necessity
In some cases, a defense of medical necessity may be applicable. This defense argues that the defendant’s actions were justified due to an immediate and pressing need for medication to prevent significant harm or alleviate severe pain or suffering. Although Ohio law generally requires individuals to obtain prescription medications through lawful means, there may be exceptional circumstances where an individual is forced to obtain medication without a prescription due to an urgent medical need. To successfully employ this defense, the defendant must show that the harm they sought to prevent by possessing or using the medication was greater than the harm caused by violating the law. For instance, if a person with a severe medical condition was unable to obtain a timely prescription and possessed a small amount of medication to manage their symptoms, they might argue that their actions were necessary to prevent a life-threatening situation. While this defense is not commonly used, it can be effective in cases where the defendant’s health was at serious risk.
Challenging the Evidence
Another important defense strategy in prescription drug cases involves challenging the evidence presented by the prosecution. This can include scrutinizing the methods used to collect, store, and analyze the evidence, as well as questioning the credibility of witnesses or the reliability of the prosecution’s case. For instance, the defense may argue that the drugs in question were improperly handled or that there was a break in the chain of custody, leading to potential contamination or tampering. In other cases, the defense might challenge the accuracy of laboratory tests used to identify the drugs, particularly if there are concerns about the testing procedures or the qualifications of the individuals who conducted the tests. Additionally, the defense can cross-examine witnesses to expose inconsistencies in their testimony or to highlight biases that may affect their credibility. By casting doubt on the reliability of the evidence, the defense can weaken the prosecution’s case and increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome for the defendant.
Mistaken Identity
In certain cases, a defense of mistaken identity may be appropriate, especially when the defendant is accused of possessing or distributing prescription drugs that were found in a shared or public space. Mistaken identity can occur when law enforcement officers mistakenly attribute the possession of drugs to the wrong person, often due to circumstantial evidence or assumptions. For example, if prescription drugs were found in a vehicle or residence occupied by multiple individuals, the defense may argue that the drugs belonged to someone else and that the defendant was wrongfully accused. Similarly, if a defendant is charged with distributing drugs based on a tip from an informant or a witness, the defense might challenge the reliability of that information and present evidence that someone else was responsible for the crime. Establishing a mistaken identity defense requires a thorough investigation and the presentation of evidence that points to another individual as the true possessor or distributor of the drugs.
Overdose Good Samaritan Law
Ohio’s Overdose Good Samaritan Law provides limited immunity from prosecution for certain drug offenses if the defendant sought emergency medical assistance for someone experiencing a drug overdose. This defense may apply in cases where the defendant is charged with possession of prescription drugs after calling 911 to report an overdose or transporting someone to the hospital. The law is intended to encourage individuals to seek help in overdose situations without fear of legal repercussions. To invoke this defense, the defendant must show that they acted in good faith and sought medical assistance for themselves or another person during an overdose. It is important to note that the immunity provided by the Overdose Good Samaritan Law is not absolute; it only applies to specific low-level drug offenses and does not protect individuals from all potential charges. However, it can be a valuable defense in cases involving prescription drugs where the defendant’s actions were motivated by a genuine concern for someone’s life.
Lack of Evidence
One of the most fundamental defenses in any criminal case, including prescription drug charges, is the argument that the prosecution has failed to present sufficient evidence to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In Ohio, as in all criminal cases, the burden of proof rests with the prosecution, and if they cannot provide adequate evidence to support each element of the alleged offense, the charges may be dismissed or result in an acquittal. The defense may argue that the evidence presented is circumstantial, inconclusive, or based on unreliable testimony. For example, if the prosecution’s case relies heavily on the testimony of a single witness with a questionable motive, the defense can challenge the credibility of that witness and argue that their testimony alone is insufficient to establish guilt. Similarly, if the physical evidence linking the defendant to the drugs is weak or nonexistent, the defense can argue that the prosecution has not met its burden of proof. Successfully raising a lack of evidence defense requires a careful analysis of the prosecution’s case and a strategic presentation of counterarguments.
Navigating the complexities of prescription drug charges in Ohio requires a comprehensive understanding of the legal system and the various defenses that can be employed to protect one’s rights. Whether it involves challenging the legality of a search, demonstrating the absence of intent, or proving the existence of a valid prescription, these defenses offer crucial avenues for individuals facing such charges. Every case is unique, and the success of a defense strategy depends on the specific facts and circumstances surrounding the charges. Therefore, it is essential for individuals accused of prescription drug offenses to seek the guidance of a skilled attorney who can evaluate their case and determine the most effective defense approach.
At Sabol & Mallory Law Firm, our legal team is dedicated to defending clients against prescription drug charges and other criminal offenses in Ohio. We understand the severe consequences that these charges can bring and are committed to providing our clients with the best possible defense. If you or someone you know is facing prescription drug charges, do not hesitate to contact us for a confidential consultation. We are here to help you navigate the legal process and protect your rights every step of the way.