Answer:
Blood and urine tests may be used to prove an above-limit concentration or impairment. The defense can examine the grounds for requesting a sample, how it was collected, and the laboratory testing, including through a motion to suppress.
Blood and urine evidence may be used in an Ohio OVI case to address alcohol, drugs, or prescription medication. The government may rely on the results to establish a prohibited concentration or support an impairment allegation.
The evidence can be challenged. A motion to suppress may address the collection process, laboratory testing, or whether officers had sufficient grounds to request the sample.
Reviewing those issues is an important part of evaluating the reliability and admissibility of chemical-test evidence.
Client
Testimonials
Learn what our clients have to say about the work of Sabol Mallory. If you have any questions or need legal help for a criminal charge, please reach out to us right away.
Chase Mallory is incredible. He is wonderful to work with and knows exactly what to do to help his clients. Thank you from the bottom of my heart for all you've done for me. I highly recommend hiring Chase to help fight your battles. Bless you!
- Erin R.
Dan Sabol is probably the best attorney I've ever worked with. Very professional and worked hard to get the best results possible. He will be the first person I call if I need a lawyer again. If you find yourself in a sticky situation make sure you give him a ring.
- Christopher R.
I had the pleasure of working with Dan and Chase and I am very grateful!! They did amazing work to help me on my case. They are very helpful and get back with you in a timely manner whenever I had questions for them, which was very nice and reassuring.
- Jessica H.
